🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding the comments delivered by ESPN commentator Chris Fowler after the Serbian champion's win over the American player during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, Fowler is American – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of letdown was appropriate. Instead, Fowler invoked the ongoing absence of American men at the majors: none of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all love a storyline, me too. But really. Even if Fritz defeated Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, whom he has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact liked his draw, because it presented the opportunity to defeat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is more than within his right to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final who else in their right mind had the lack of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the global rankings entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive strength on each front side and reverse side are more than adequate to dispose of most rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the select few generational talents, however, he is often overmatched. The past few seasons has witnessed the interesting emergence of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless move around with the alarming quickness and fluidity of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a drop shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a several significant, improbable advancements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly exploded up to fourth place – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing drought of American men lifting grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s performance in that very last eight match should have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American creating plenty of chances to break. But the champion saved service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a terrible service game to drop serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to expend excessive energy to prevail. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to the sky. He prolonged the contest twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a consequence of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly ironclad evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any form of the Serbian, who lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially seem like he thought he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a patient, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a match, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I fail to do it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of claiming a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually highly improbable for all other players. {